WHAT IN THE ANTI???

 

Political conversation between family and friends and even observed via media outlets is the common use of the prefix “anti”.  Either “Anti-government”, or “Anti-immigration”, the importance is put on the adjunct, building on the topic. But what does it really mean and what does it suggest when used in politics? Merriam-Webster defines anti as “one that is opposed”. There is a lot of that between party lines. Political actors opposing the status quo use this type of rhetoric to energize their supporters and separate themselves from the others. Using this as a tool could put political actors in influential or alienating positions.

Most “anti” rhetoric deeply held beliefs that actors are not able to be swayed by. For example, “Anti-government” gives a point of view that is distrusting of government actions and political figures. Proponents of this perspective would be hesitant to accept anything the government vocalizes whether it is policy change or funding for relief. The term “anti-immigration” looks to restrict an individual’s movements from one state or country to another. Attitudes engrained in national identity that negatively affect ethnic groups, align with anti-immigration rhetoric, which isolates them. “Anti” rhetoric like “anti-corruption” or “anti-racism” is used by advocates to tear down organizational structures that lack equality and fairness. Advocates use this tool to bring awareness and encourage change. 

Today, the use of “Anti” rhetoric immediately labels an individual motivating others to either be for the cause or be against it. “Anti” rhetoric can be cut both ways, so it is wise to examine the complexities in politics and weigh the influences it has on society. How do you feel about the use of "Anti" rhetoric?